Yes. I thought it was a fluke…but I am hoping that it’s going to stay.

I lost my page rank and alexa ranking last year because the good people at PayPerPost aka IZEA aka MINDCOMET thought it was a good joke to place WORST BLOGGER OF ALL TIME award to hit out at people like me, Perez Hilton and ObNoxious Blogger like some people, but hardly, I don’t care much then, until Google Smacked Me…means my Adsense are dead ..along with my other advertisers shying away from us.

Anyway, I battled it out, and seems I won. I am still getting you to read my posts, and articles which are paying about $15 a pop on Helium (it’s NOT PAID POSTS, but rather Independent Contributions) which… I love to contribute the proceeds to Charity, like Teachers Without Borders.

All I am asking is to be blessed with all these, and wish you to link me, in exchange.. I will

I was gob smacked that they had the cheek to do that…

Today’s Email:

Dear Nuffnanger,

Hello there! We’d like to inform you that your blog has been selected to run an upcoming Cost Per Click ad campaign ROYAL FLUSH ASIA which is related to poker.

Contrary to popular belief that Poker is purely about gambling, it is a sport that is widely recognized worldwide.

Poker is seen as a sport in the same way billiards, chess bowling, and golf are not athletic sports but sports nevertheless.

Bridge is an Olympic sport and there is talk of poker being accepted into the International Olympic Committee. Singapore has also allowed Betfair to host online poker tournaments to qualify for the Singapore Asian Poker Tour. Hence, it is clear that poker is does not mainly revolve around gambling as a lot of thinking skills are required to play this game.

You can check out more by clicking here and here.

However, if you would like to have the ad removed from your blog, please e-mail scott.chua@nuffnang.com

Have a nice day!

Nicholas Chay
Marketing Manager
Nuffnang Pte Ltd

OK…now legally speaking…SINGAPORE MAY ALLOW YOU TO PLAY..but did you know of the followings?

BLOGGER:

Sorry guys…

This is what the TERMS on the Blogger..for yr info

15. Choice of Law; Jurisdiction; Forum. These Terms of Service will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without giving effect to its conflict of laws provisions or your actual state or country of residence. Any claims, legal proceeding or litigation arising in connection with the Service will be brought solely in Santa Clara County, California, and you consent to the jurisdiction of such courts.

Which means..NO POKER or GAMING…as CALIFORNIA PROHIBITS THAT.
Thanks.

And read with the Google TOS
8.2 You should be aware that Content presented to you as part of the Services, including but not limited to advertisements in the Services and sponsored Content within the Services may be protected by intellectual property rights which are owned by the sponsors or advertisers who provide that Content to Google (or by other persons or companies on their behalf). You may not modify, rent, lease, loan, sell, distribute or create derivative works based on this Content (either in whole or in part) unless you have been specifically told that you may do so by Google or by the owners of that Content, in a separate agreement.

8.3 Google reserves the right (but shall have no obligation) to pre-screen, review, flag, filter, modify, refuse or remove any or all Content from any Service. For some of the Services, Google may provide tools to filter out explicit sexual content. These tools include the SafeSearch preference settings (see http://www.google.com/help/customize.html#safe). In addition, there are commercially available services and software to limit access to material that you may find objectionable.

8.4 You understand that by using the Services you may be exposed to Content that you may find offensive, indecent or objectionable and that, in this respect, you use the Services at your own risk.

8.5 You agree that you are solely responsible for (and that Google has no responsibility to you or to any third party for) any Content that you create, transmit or display while using the Services and for the consequences of your actions (including any loss or damage which Google may suffer) by doing so.

—– Original Message —–
From: azrin
To: Nuffnang
Cc: scott.chua@nuffnang.com ; Timothy Tiah
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 6:45 AM
Subject: Re: Royal Flush Asia CPC Campaign

Unfortunately guys, this is already in breach of users who are hosted in the US, as this requires a gaming license.

reference to the advertising laws in the US and the UK itself too, which is a CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

so please note: NO PORN RELATED or BETTING GAMING (EVEN BACKGAMMON) allowed on Blogspot or US Hosted sites.

this is the advertising law, unless the person holds a Gaming License.

Which means….
NO US BASED BLOGGER OR HOSTED IN US CAN ADVERTISE POKER , BACK GAMMON OR CASINO.

Why did their lawyer say can huh?

I’m not going to be a kill joy..but this is the law pertaining you guys using US BASED hosts, and this is to be read with the WIRE ACT and the COMMUNICATIONS BILL.

UNLAWFUL INTERNET GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT
This title may be cited as the: Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006

Internet Gambling ActSEC. 802.
PROHIBITION ON ACCEPTANCE OF ANY PAYMENT INSTRUMENT FOR UNLAWFUL INTERNET GAMBLING.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
SUBCHAPTER IV
PROHIBITION ON FUNDING OF UNLAWFUL INTERNET GAMBLING
§ 5361. Congressional findings and purpose
(a) FINDINGS.
Congress finds the following:
(1) Internet gambling is primarily funded through personal use of payment system instruments, credit cards, and wire transfers.
(2) The National Gambling Impact Study Commission in 1999 recommended the passage of legislation to prohibit wire transfers to Internet gambling sites or the banks which represent such sites.
(3) Internet gambling is a growing cause of debt collection problems for insured depository institutions and the consumer credit industry.
(4) New mechanisms for enforcing gambling laws on the Internet are necessary because traditional law enforcement mechanisms are often inadequate for enforcing gambling prohibitions or regulations on the Internet, especially where such gambling crosses State or national borders.
(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.
NO provision of this subchapter shall be construed as altering, limiting, or extending any Federal or State law or Tribal-State compact prohibiting, permitting, or regulating gambling within the United States.

§ 5362. Definitions
In this subchapter:
(1 ) BET OR WAGER.
The term ‘bet or wager’—
(A) means the staking or risking by any person of something of value upon the outcome of a contest of others, a sporting event, or a game subject to chance, upon an agreement or understanding that the person or another person will receive something of value in the event of a certain outcome;
(B) includes the purchase of a chance or opportunity to win a lottery or other prize (which opportunity to win is predominantly subject to chance);
(C) includes any scheme of a type described in section 3702 of title 28;
(D) includes any instructions or information pertaining to the establishment or movement of funds by the bettor or customer in, to, or from an account with the business of betting or wagering; and
(E) does not include-
(i) any activity governed by the securities laws (as that term is defined in section 3(a)(47) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the purchase or sale of securities (as that term is defined in section 3(a)(10) of that Act);
(ii) any transaction conducted on or subject to the rules of a registered entity or exempt board of trade under the Commodity Exchange Act;
(iii) any over-the-counter derivative instrument;
(iv) any other transaction that
(I) is excluded or exempt from regulation under the Commodity Exchange Act; or
(II) is exempt from State gaming or bucket shop laws under section 12(e) of the Commodity Exchange Act or section 28(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
(v) any contract of indemnity or guarantee;
(vi) any contract for insurance;
(vii) any deposit or other transaction with an insured depository institution;
(viii) participation in any game or contest in which participants do not stake or risk anything of value other than
(I) personal efforts of the participants in playing the game or contest or obtaining access to the Internet; or
(II) points or credits that the sponsor of the game or contest provides to participants free of charge and that can be used or redeemed only for participation in games or contests offered by the sponsor; or
(ix) participation in any fantasy or simulation sports game or educational game or contest in which (if the game or contest involves a team or teams) no fantasy or simulation sports team is based on the current membership of an actual team that is a member of an amateur or professional sports organization (as those terms are defined in section 3701 of title 28) and that meets the following conditions:
(I) All prizes and awards offered to winning participants are established and made known to the participants in advance of the game or contest and their value is not determined by the number of participants or the amount of any fees paid by those participants.
(II) All winning outcomes reflect the relative knowledge and skill of the participants and are determined predominantly by accumulated statistical results of the performance of individuals (athletes in the case of sports events) in multiple real-world sporting or other events.
(III) No winning outcome is based
(aa) on the score, pointspread, or any performance or performances of any single real world team or any combination of such teams; or
(bb) solely on any single performance of an individual athlete in any single real-world sporting or other event.

(2) BUSINESS OF BETTING OR WAGERING.
The term ‘business of betting or wagering’ does not include the activities of a financial transaction provider, or any interactive computer service or telecommunications service.

(3) DESIGNATED PAYMENT SYSTEM.
The term ‘designated payment system’ means any system utilized by a financial transaction provider that the Secretary and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, in consultation with the Attorney General, jointly determine, by regulation or order, could be utilized in connection with, or to facilitate, any restricted transaction.

(4) FINANCIAL TRANSACTION PROVIDER.
The term ‘financial transaction provider’ means a creditor, credit card issuer, financial institution, operator of a terminal at which an electronic fund transfer may be initiated, money transmitting business, or international, national, regional, or local payment network utilized to effect a credit transaction, electronic fund transfer, stored value product transaction, or money transmitting service, or a participant in such network, or other participant in a designated payment system.

(5) INTERNET.
The term ‘Internet’ means the international computer network of interoperable packet switched data networks.

(6) INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SERVICE.
The term ‘interactive computer service’ has the meaning given the term in section 230(f) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230(f)).

(7) RESTRICTED TRANSACTION.
The term ‘restricted transaction’ means any transaction or transmittal involving any credit, funds, instrument, or proceeds described in any paragraph of section 5363 which the recipient is prohibited from accepting under section 5363.

(8) SECRETARY.
The term ‘Secretary’ means the Secretary of the Treasury.

(9) STATE.
The term ‘State’ means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, or any commonwealth, territory, or other possession of the United States.

(10) UNLAWFUL INTERNET GAMBLING.
(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘unlawful Internet gambling’ means to place, receive, or otherwise knowingly transmit a bet or wager by any means which involves the use, at least in part, of the Internet where such bet or wager is unlawful under any applicable Federal or State law in the State or Tribal lands in which the bet or wager is initiated, received, or otherwise made.
(B) INTRASTATE TRANSACTIONS.
The term ‘unlawful Internet gambling’ does not inelude placing, receiving, or otherwise transmitting a bet or wager where
(i) the bet or wager is initiated and received or otherwise made exclusively within a single State;
(ii) the bet or wager and the method by which the bet or wager is initiated and received or otherwise made is expressly authorized by and placed in accordance with the laws of such State, and the State law or regulations include-
(I) age and location verification requirements reasonably designed to block access to minors and persons located out of such State; and
(II) appropriate data security standards to prevent unauthorized access by any person whose age and current location has not been verified in accordance with such State’s law regulations; and
(iii) the bet or wager does not violate any provision of-
(I) the Interstate Horseracing Act of 1978 (15 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.);
(II) chapter 178 of title 28 (commonly known as the ‘Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’);
(III) the Gambling Devices Transportation Act (15 U. S. C. 1171 et seq.); or
(IV) the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.).
(C) INTRATRIBAL TRANSACTIONS.
The term ‘unlawful Internet gambling’ does not inelude placing, receiving, or otherwise transmitting a bet or wager where-
(i) the bet or wager is initiated and received or otherwise made exclusively-
(I) within the Indian lands of a single Indian tribe (as such terms are defined under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act; or
(II) between the Indian lands of 2 or more Indian tribes to the extent that intertribal gaming is authorized by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act;
(ii) the bet or wager and the method by which the bet or wager is initiated and received or otherwise made is expressly authorized by and complies with the requirements of-
(I) the applicable tribal ordinance or resolution approved by the Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission; and
(II) with respect to class III gaming, the applicable Tribal-State Compact;
(iii) the applicable tribal ordinance or resolution or Tribal-State compact includes
(I) age and location verification requirements reasonably designed to block access to minors and persons located out of the applicable Tribal lands; and
(II) appropriate data security standards to prevent unauthorized access by any person whose age and current location has not been verified in accordance with the applicable tribal ordinance or resolution or Tribal-State Compact; and
(iv) the bet or wager does not violate any provision of-
(I) the Interstate Horseracing Act of 1978 (15 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.);
(II) chapter 178 of title 28 (commonly known as the ‘Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’);
(III) the Gambling Devices Transportation Act (15 U. S. C. 1171 et seq.); or
(IV) the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.).
(D) INTERSTATE HORSERACING.
(i) IN GENERAL—The term ‘unlawful Internet gambling’ shall not include any activity that is allowed under the Interstate Horseracing Act of 1978 (15 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.).
(ii) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION REGARDING PREEMPTION.
Nothing in this subchapter may be construed to preempt any State law prohibiting gambling.
(iii) SENSE OF CONGRESS.
It is the sense of Congress that this subchapter shall not change which activities related to horse racing may or may not be allowed under Federal law. This subparagraph is intended to address concerns that this subchapter could have the effect of changing the existing relationship between the Interstate Horseracing Act and other Federal statutes in effect on the date of the enactment of this subchapter. This subchapter is not intended to change that relationship. This subchapter is not intended to resolve any existing disagreements over how to interpret the relationship between the Interstate Horseracing Act and other Federal statutes.
(E) INTERMEDIATE ROUTING.
The intermediate routing of electronic data shall not determine the location or locations in which a bet or wager is initiated, received, or otherwise made.

(11) OTHER TERMS.
(A) CREDIT; CREDITOR; CREDIT CARD; AND CARD ISSUER.
The terms ‘credit’, ‘creditor’, ‘credit card’, and ‘card issuer’ have the meanings given the terms in section 103 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1602).
(B) ELECTRONIC FUND TRANSFER.
The term ‘electronic fund transfer’
(i) has the meaning given the term in section 903 of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (15 U. S. C . 1693a), except that the term includes transfers that would otherwise be excluded under section 903(6)(E) of that Act; and
(ii) includes any fund transfer covered by Article 4A of the Uniform Commercial Code, as in effect in any State.
(C) FINANCIAL INSTITUTION.
The term ‘financial institution’ has the meaning given the term in section 903 of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, except that such term does not include a casino, sports book, or other business at or through which bets or wagers may be placed or received.
(D) INSURED DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION.
The term ‘insured depository institution’—
(i) has the meaning given the term in section 3(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(c)); and
(ii) includes an insured credit union (as defined in section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act)
(E) MONEY TRANSMITTING BUSINESS AND MONEY TRANSMITTING SERVICE .
The terms ‘money transmitting business’ and ‘money transmitting service’ have the meanings given the terms in section 5330(d) (determined without regard to any regulations prescribed by the Secretary thereunder).

§ 5363. Prohibition on acceptance of any financial instrument for unlawful Internet gambling
No person engaged in the business of betting or wagering may knowingly accept, in connection with the participation of another person in unlawful Internet gambling-
(1) credit, or the proceeds of credit, extended to or on behalf of such other person (including credit extended through the use of a credit card);
(2) an electronic fund transfer, or funds transmitted by or through a money transmitting business, or the proceeds of an electronic fund transfer or money transmitting service, from or on behalf of such other person;
(3) any check, draft, or similar instrument which is drawn by or on behalf of such other person and is drawn on or payable at or through any finanvial institution; or
(4) the proceeds of any other form of financial transaction, as the Secretary and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System may jointly prescribe by regulation, which involves a financial institution as a payor or financial intermediary on behalf of or for the benefit of such other person.

§ 5364. Policies and procedures to identify and prevent restricted transactions
(a) REGULATIONS.
Before the end of the 270-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this subchapter, the Secretary and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, in consultation with the Attorney General, shall prescribe regulations (which the Secretary and the Board jointly determine to be appropriate) requiring each designated payment system, and all participants therein, to identify and block or otherwise prevent or prohibit restricted transactions through the establishment of policies and procedures reasonably designed to identify and block or otherwise prevent or prohibit the acceptance of restricted transactions in any of the following ways:
(1) The establishment of policies and procedures that-
(A) allow the payment system and any person involved in the payment system to identify restricted transactions by means of codes in authorization messages or by other means; and
(B) block restricted transactions identified as a result of the policies and procedures developed pursuant to subparagraph (A).
(2) The establishment of policies and procedures that prevent or prohibit the acceptance of the products or services of the payment system in connection with a restricted transaction.
(b) REQUIREMENTS FOR POLICIES AND PROCEDURES.
In prescribing regulations under subsection (a), the Secretary and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall-
(1) identify types of policies and procedures, including nonexclusive examples, which would be deemed, as applicable, to be reasonably designed to identify and block or otherwise prevent or prohibit the acceptance of the products or services with respect to each type of restricted transaction;
(2) to the extent practical, permit any participant in a payment system to choose among alternative means of identifying and blocking, or otherwise preventing or prohibiting the acceptance of the products or services of the payment system or participant in connection with, restricted transactions;
(3) exempt certain restricted transactions or designated payment systems from any requirement imposed under such regulations, if the Secretary and the Board jointly find that it is not reasonably practical to identify and block, or otherwise prevent or prohibit the acceptance of, such transactions; and
(4) ensure that transactions in connection with any activity excluded from the definition of unlawful internet gambling in subparagraphs (B), (C), or (D)(i) of section 5362(10) are not blocked or otherwise prevented or prohibited by the prescribed regulations.
(c) COMPLIANCE WITH PAYMENT SYSTEM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES.
A financial transaction provider shall be considered to be in compliance with the regulations prescribed under subsection (a) if-
(1) such person relies on and complies with the policies and procedures of a designated payment system of which it is a member or participant to-
(A) identify and block restricted transactions; or
(B) otherwise prevent or prohibit the acceptance of the products or services of the payment system, member, or participant in connection with restricted transactions; and
(2) such policies and procedures of the designated payment system comply with the requirements of regulations prescribed under subsection (a).
(d) NO LIABILITY FOR BLOCKING OR REFUSING TO HONOR RESTRICTED TRANSACTIONS.
A person that identifies and blocks a transaction, prevents or prohibits the acceptance of its products or services in connection with a transaction, or otherwise refuses to honor a transaction-
(1) that is a restricted transaction;
(2) that such person reasonably believes to be a restricted transaction; or
(3) as a designated payment system or a member of a designated payment system in reliance on the policies and procedures of the payment system, in an effort to comply with regulations prescribed under subsection (a), shall not be liable to any party for such action.
(e) REGULATORY ENFORCEMENT.
The requirements under this section shall be enforced exclusively by-
(1) the Federal functional regulators, with respect to the designated payment systems and financial transaction providers subject to the respective jurisdiction of such regulators under section 505(a) of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and section 5g of the Commodities Exchange Act; and
(2) the Federal Trade Commission, with respect to designated payment systems and financial transaction providers not otherwise subject to the jurisdiction of any Federal functional regulators (ineluding the Commission) as described in paragraph (1).

§ 5365. Civil remedies
(a) JURISDICTION.—In addition to any other remedy under current law, the district courts of the United States shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction to prevent and restrain restricted transactions by issuing appropriate orders in accordance with this section, regardless of whether a prosecution has been initiated under this subchapter.
(b) PROCEEDINGS.
(1) INSTITUTION BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
(A) IN GENERAL.
The United States, acting through the Attorney General, may institute proceedings under this section to prevent or restrain a restricted transaction.
(B) RELIEF.
Upon application of the United States under this paragraph, the district court may enter a temporary restraining order, a preliminary injunction, or an injunction against any person to prevent or restrain a restricted transaction, in accordance with rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
(2) INSTITUTION BY STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
(A) IN GENERAL.
The attorney general (or other appropriate State official) of a State in which a restricted transaction allegedly has been or will be initiated, received, or otherwise made may institute proceedings under this section to prevent or restrain the violation or threatened violation.
(B) RELIEF.
Upon application of the attorney general (or other appropriate State official) of an affected State under this paragraph, the district court may enter a temporary restraining order, a preliminary injunction, or an injunction against any person to prevent or restrain a restricted transaction, in accordance with rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
(3) INDIAN LANDS.
(A) IN GENERAL.
Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2), for a restricted transaction that allegedly has been or will be initiated, received, or otherwise made on Indian lands (as that term is defined in section 4 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act)-
(i) the United States shall have the enforcement authority provided under paragraph (1); and
(ii) the enforcement authorities specified in an applicable Tribal-State compact negotiated under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2710)shall be carried out in accordance with that compact.
(B) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.
No provision of this section shall be construed as altering, superseding, or otherwise affecting the application of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.
(c) LIMITATION RELATING TO INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SERVICES.
(1) IN GENERAL.
Relief granted under this section against an interactive computer service shall-
(A) be limited to the removal of, or disabling of access to, an online site violating section 5363, or a hypertext link to an online site violating such section, that resides on a computer server that such service controls or operates, except that the limitation in this subparagraph shall not apply if the service is subject to liability under this section under section 5367;
(B) be available only after notice to the interactive computer service and an opportunity for the service to appear are provided;
(C) not impose any obligation on an interactive computer service to monitor its service or to affirmatively seek facts indicating activity violating this subchapter;
(D) specify the interactive computer service to which it applies; and
(E) specifically identify the location of the online site or hypertext link to be removed or access to which is to be disabled.
(2) COORDINATION WITH OTHER LAW.
An interactive computer service that does not violate this subchapter shall not be liable under section 1084(d) of title 18, except that the limitation in this paragraph shall not apply if an interactive computer service has actual knowledge and control of bets and wagers and-
(A) operates, manages, supervises, or directs an Internet website at which unlawful bets or wagers may be placed, received, or otherwise made or at which unlawful bets or wagers are offered to be placed, received, or otherwise made; or
(B) owns or controls, or is owned or controlled by, any person who operates, manages, supervises, or directs an Internet website at which unlawful bets or wagers may be placed, received, or otherwise made, or at which unlawful bets or wagers are offered to be placed, received, or otherwise made.
(d) LIMITATION ON INJUNCTIONS AGAINST REGULATED PERSONS.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, and subject to section 5367, no provision of this subchapter shall be construed as authorizing the Attorney General of the United States, or the attorney general (or other appropriate State official) of any State to institute proceedings to prevent or restrain a restricted transaction against any financial transaction provider, to the extent that the person is acting as a financial transaction provider.

§ 5366. Criminal penalties
(a) IN GENERAL.
Any person who violates section 5363 shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both.
(b) PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
Upon conviction of a person under this section, the court may enter a permanent injunction enjoining such person from placing, receiving, or otherwise making bets or wagers or sending, receiving, or inviting information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers.

§ 5367. Circumventions prohibited
Notwithstanding section 5362(2), a financial transaction provider, or any interactive computer service or telecommunications service, may be liable under this subchapter if such person has actual knowledge and control of bets and wagers, and-
(1) operates, manages, supervises, or directs an Internet website at which unlawful bets or wagers may be placed, received, or otherwise made, or at which unlawful bets or wagers are offered to be placed, received, or otherwise made; or
(2) owns or controls, or is owned or controlled by, any person who operates, manages, supervises, or directs an Internet website at which unlawful bets or wagers may be placed, received, or otherwise made, or at which unlawful bets or wagers are offered to be placed, received, or otherwise made.”
(b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.
The table of sections for chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
SUBCHAPTER IV-PROHIBITION ON FUNDING OF UNLAWFUL INTERNET GAMBLING
5361. Congressional findings and purpose
5362. Definitions
5363. Prohibition on acceptance of any financial instrument for unlawful Internet gambling
5364. Policies and procedures to identify and prevent restricted transactions 5365. Civil remedies
5366. Criminal penalties
5367. Circumventions prohibited.

SEC. 803.
INTERNET GAMBLING IN OR THROUGH FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS.
(a) IN GENERAL.
In deliberations between the United States Government and any foreign country on money laundering, corruption, and crime issues, the United States Government should
(1) encourage cooperation by foreign governments and relevant international fora in identifying whether Internet gambling operations are being used for money laundering, corruption, or other crimes;
(2) advance policies that promote the cooperation of foreign governments, through information sharing or other measures, in the enforcement of this Act; and
(3) encourage the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering, in its annual report on money laundering typologies, to study the extent to which Internet gambling operations are being used for money laundering purposes.
(b) REPORT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall submit an annual report to the Congress on any deliberations between the United States and other countries on issues relating to Internet gambling.

That is why you can’t use PAYPAL for gaming or backgammon payments as it’s Illegal. Heck, NUFFNANG SINGAPORE in itself breaches this as their host is located in SAN ANTONIO TEXAS really prohibits that strongly, so means NO BANNERS ETC to be hosted on your server, and alongside that, read with the Singapore Communications ACT….which I don’t wanna read …too much to write about.

Please bloggers..consider it before being greedy.

I had an argument with a lady a couple weeks ago over Chinese New Year, mainly because I was very busy with my work and the joker was sniggering at me, saying Mr Millionaire etc, but I put it aside.

Put to put to the case, of Plagiarism, I told her that it is NOT NICE to just cut-and-paste whole of the content of one post and cross post it across 3 other blogs just to make it an interim for paid blogging is just plainly not right. Honest, if you look through it, you will see, that the pictures and everything is the same, and there she is complaining that there is no money to be made and no traffic to any of the site because there is NO RELEVANT CONTENT whatsoever. Everything is just a cut and paste, plus that is a ban on Google Page Rank. How daff can one get. It’s really so hard to get to her thick skull with full of fatty pride.

I’m sorry to say that, and that you really take people for a ride. I don’t get paid for anything I help. I charge people $400/hr and even through my SKYPE, I get $2.99 a minute for any consultation provided. And there you go having the cheek to say that it’s wrong of me to demand am RM250 hamper for Chinese New Year, even though I MAY BE JOKING. Heck even Nuffnang gave me something for my supportive comments through their days and at least , a simple token of good gesture. What is worse, domains aside..I had to endure the fact that you kept on buzzing me for FINANCIAL ADVISE of Letter of Credit (LC) etc..which I told ya to talk to your banker, because they will charge you for it. What do I get for you wasting 5 hours of my time? Nothing. Not even an offer of a cup of Java.

Is that a friend?Nay. Don’t believe it.. Go to TSLDESIGNS dot com slash wordpress and see the other blogs to it like DIANA TAN dot NET. See it?

You ain’t getting no linky for me.Sorry.

Well now. I still have alot of tasks to do.

Let me see:

Blogsvertise Reviews : 3
Helium Tasks: 500 Articles Pending
Aductions : To recruit more bloggers.

Yes people… I HAVE BEEN ASSIGNED 500 ARTICLES for Helium. That’s right 500 good pieces of articles in the competitive category of Citizen Journalism and Technology.Each sub category must have at least 3 articles that are competing with. That is alot of articles since I have to answer to a panel of reviewers whom will rate my articles. If that is not bad enough…. each article must be at least 350 words or 2100 characters.

What will I get out of that? Not much, about $2 a pop plus any royalties (which works to about $75 each accepted article that is assigned to a publisher). But with 500, means it works to aat least $1900 by April 15. Yes. That is my deadline.

Aductions actually offered me a task to recruit as many bloggers as possible because of their new launch coming up this March. Mainly, they have an influx of advertisers opting for CPC and CPM ads at a certain cost. Well, I was told it will be worth more than Nuffnang, as they have SET THEIR OFFICE UP in Damansara. Sources inside their head office is that they are even advertising in Ad:Tech Singapore this June.

They must be hungry for our goodies that they set up a Malaysian office instead of a European one as their first Overseas Office. If you looking for a job with them, just look out for their press release within the fortnight.

Anyone want to help me out here?

To all of you, it’s the end of the line for me, since I won’t get anything out of my blogging from this pages.Mainly , it’s not my doing other than Paid blogging on PAY PER POST which placed me on the worst blogger of the year campaign. That killed my page rank, alexa ranking and other real value to my site. It’s like what my sis screamed about… death comes to paid blogging.

Right now, with the lack of paid blogging revenue plus that not enough traffic driving my web sites to scale, I have to resort to doing the ultimate sin… finding a proper day job.

Meaning, I won’t have the time of my life anymore. No more being my own boss. No more being able to do anything I wish at any moment’s notice.

Actually, it means I have to resign from RA Tree Intra Holdings Sdn Bhd as their business development director too… since business has not been that great with the economy not being well, ie in RECESSION.

Even with me removing all my paid links… the pagerank won’t come back. Even I can’t get an account at OCBC or UOB just because I was a victim of fraud and the account did not behave as it should…(who is the fool, when the bank authorised a card transaction when there is no money in it)

Whatever it is, I will be selling my domains too. Well, TEMASEK.NU and CHAT.NU is up for sale with reserve prices of US$100,000 and US$150,000 respectively. This is despite Temasek Holdings giving an informal offer of 100,000 shares in the stock market (won’t say which one due to SGX Laws) in exchange for TEMASEK.NU

What does it actually mean?
I will still operate iExploreAsia Media alongside GizmoNET Intraweb Domain & Technical Services as a sideline and an initial seed capitalist doing micro-lending of technology to start-ups. If business venture gets better, well, we will talk about this when we it’s time to cross the river.

I will be actively in the blogging, but not as often.

So unless Nuffnang up my earnings to over $7000 a month, then it will be OK.

PS: I have not tried CHIPSTER yet because it’s way out of my budget for a snack (i’ll just down alot of them junk at a go..) but then, I would anytime lay myself down over a whole bag of Salmon Terriyaki Twisties…which ..is actually more expensive (about RM2.70)

Heh heh heh….

I was starting my initial advertising campaign for a customer of mine, just to test out the market as to the quality of back links and Conversion Ratios just to see how reliable our Malaysian and Singapore market are.

One thing that made me furious is whan I am told to be more polite? Heck, I don’t use vulgarities and what not and since we are all in Business to make money, we make comments and lash it out when things don’t go straight. We are not politicians where we have to kiss babies butts just to get elected (did I mention some Malaysian politician did it today?)

And as to Fraud Review report from 2CO, why the need to? I told them that they MUST get their own PAYPAL Account so they can know it’s fraudulent or not as the PayPal user ratings are already there , either verified or not and if they are eligible for protection.

So, was I wrong in telling them off that they took ages to get things done? Or did I listen not correctly. Nor did I get that email stating that media rich will be up only in June or July *(I Archived all my emails for 7 years in compliance to FCC Laws). In giving them a chance to prove the market wrong because of the lack of nufflets GoKita advertising media Publishers makes me wonder too..if I will get fraud clicks.

And as to my questions… I think it’s legit..since it’s my customer’s money I am entrusted to work with and without CLARITY and TRUST *(Jujur dan Amanah), there is no honour within oneself to be alive.

As an advertiser, we try to be patient, but when hickups happen, things are bound to be sour, after all you promised that everything will be responded to , reviewed etc after 24 hours which basically did not happen!

I too have to run a business, and I take to task replying ALL and actioning my support tickets within 12 hours, which is not a hard thing to do.

That in itself, is very polite of me in my comments and posts, without any vulgarities or such not that I have been reading about over the web, plus you guys did not even make a press release about the Nuffnang and Advertlets* suing you guys over the NuffLets brand name.

Also, In itself, I sincerely thought all the API etc is already GoKita instead of being redirected from 2CO as Nufflets , and what about that you getting your own Paypal account?

I am without holds, just as Tech Crunch are… So if you want to make and run a proper business, do it properly with a full heart.

Best Regards
*Subject to disclosures

So, what I mean is be transparent, bitter or not. And HostForWeb don’t own the infrastructure in itself.And didn’t you mention that you used VPS instead of dedicated? Because if it’s dedicated, it won’t be more sluggish than my old cranny IBM Netvista 1Ghz PC after running Video Editing programs.

Really this is driving me nuts…and my client has the right to do so since they pay me…. so when things don’t work… I scream it out. At least if something screws up at Nuffnang I can always call Tim at 3am in the morning to get him to sort it out.

With you Nabil..you can’t even provide me with your cell phone number, nor it’s a Sdn Bhd Company. I like to help out our people…. supportive…but this is crucial criticism. Sort it.

We are pleased to announce that Kodak is advertising on our internal networks alongside with other key networks like ASDA and even Porsche. Yes, the notorious out of reach PORSCHE is advertising on our network but due to it’s dermographic targetting, some of you may not see their new campaign or the media rich creatives.

Yes, it means alot of money to be earned for those serving my internal network of clientèle. Averaging over $10 CPM, this are high paying converting ads which some don’t see much sense into that. Well, in essence, it still drives and makes money.

Does it mean I will loose my Glitterati? Maybe as this are target specific. I actually don’t mind loosing them as I don’t make enough on it to warrant me loosing my precious sleep. Some even point out I shouldn’t be cluttering my site with so many ads but then I am just gathering dermographics and statistics to which product or targetting suits me. Those enquiring on if I would be placing an advertorial guide to Forbes campaign run, my answer is not so soon as I have a few products and projects to complete in the first instance. But what I can tell, is that Forbes in itself are getting very much aggressive in their marketing to offering as much as $70 a day in bid advertising to those who carry a lot of weight… like members of the National Press Club in the US which all US Presidents are part of.

To get to that, means it’s alot of work, and alot of reviews, some over 2100 characters or 500 words or more whichever is higher. Plus you have to rate about 500 reviews in a week to retain 5 star membership which is alot of work.

To be one. you need to join Helium (or email me for an invite to the League) and write as much as possible. Plus you get royalties for that.To date, I myself have earned over $200+ in reading royalties for them and other mentions in publications such as Wall Street Journal.

Oh did I mention that you get about $60 per piece of selected article for the publishers?

Ooh well, join in.!